Home

Advertisement

Customize
October 2007   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Thought of the day #1

Posted on 2007.10.23 at 19:35
I don't know why people hate walking. It only takes a couple of years at most to learn to do it perfectly, and we pretty much do it for the rest of our lives. And if for some reason we can't do it anymore it gets us hell of depressed for at least a little while.

So yeah. Up with walking, people.

ZedPower's Racism Corner

Posted on 2007.05.14 at 19:12
So I pick up the ringing phone. Caller ID shows a name that I figured was Greek. The heavily accented voice at the other end of the line asks about the apartment for rent. I don't have an apartment for rent.

Now this happens all the time. Some dork landlord somewhere in town misspelled his own phone number on his "For Rent" posters. Every once in a while someone calls us to rent a place. We politely explain the mistake to these people and that's the end of it.

But not this time. The guy on the other end of the line apparently understood what I told him, but he didn't seem to believe me. In fact he seemed to be getting angry.

Then it dawned on me.

"This guy thinks I pretend not to have an place for rent because I'm racist and I don't want a Greek guy in my building."

I tried to explain it again, but that was a pretty dumb idea. What was I supposed to say? "NO I'M NOT A BIGOT I JUST DON'T HAVE A BUILDING OK BYE. NOT RACIST! BYE! I LOVE GYROS! BYE FOR REAL THIS TIME!" and then hang up? So I just hung up. This is one of these situations where you just can't win.

Legacy

Posted on 2007.04.11 at 10:43
So, I've inherited a car yesterday. It's kind of a weird thing to say. Not sure why. It's the second of my grandfather's vehicles I get to drive. My mother purchased his '77 Chevrolet Malibu, back when he was still alive. Now I have the '92 Mercury Tracer he bought soon thereafter.

Now I'm not a car guy, but for the benefit of other non-car people out there, I'll venture to say this: one of these two cars is not like the other. They're both awesome, but for different reasons. The Malibu was awesome because it was a badass car, a gigantic orange behemoth that roared to enthusiastic life with the slightest push of the gas pedal. The Tracer is kind of dinky, not unlike the nipponese tin cans with lawnmower engines you have to drive in Gran Turismo games before they let you ride the cars you actually want to ride. But it's still awesome. Because it's mine, and because it used to belong to my grandfather.

It's kind of a weird thing to say. "This man has died, now I have some of his stuff." Hmm. Inheritance is one of the few old fashioned things anyone still cares about in this day and age, but even though I happen to find myself on the receiving end, I have kind of mixed feelings about it. (Of course, inheritance is one of the rare circumstances where it is difficult to argue againt how it is better to receive than to give.)

I say I'm not a car guy, but I'm not sure how long that's going to be true. I find myself liking this tiny machine very much. More than I expected. The underside is all rusty from sitting in a driveway almost completely unused for three years while my grandfather suffered from severe Alzheimer's, the muffler's spirit has long left its body, and the transmission (I think) had several instances of what I lovingly referred to as "mysterious epileptic fits" during the 250km trip back home from my grandmother's place. I've got a garage appointment in a few hours and I'll undoubtedly spent nearly as much money as the car itself is worth on various repairs to get it back in decent working order again. But I find myself not particularly annoyed or daunted at the prospect of burning all that cash on a car. Not sure why. I guess it's a first time thing.

Water from the sky

Posted on 2007.04.10 at 02:13
I've been following that show on NBC, Raines. That's unusual for me, I don't generally care much for fiction series on TV for a reason that I haven't bothered to examine yet. I read that some aspects of the show are cliché, but it doesn't bother me as much as it might; I watch so very little of that kind of program that's it's all new to me. Anyway.  If you don't know what the show is about you probably won't get what this post is about. That's cool. I don't have a readership. You don't even exist. So google it up or something, you non-existent audience member, you. No offense.

(So I'm writing to myself? Feel free to see any parallels to the subject at hand.)

The main character in Raines, played (I want to say "fabulously", but it feels wrong; what has the English language done to this word?) excellently by Jeff Goldblum, is a cop who investigates murder cases. The hook of the show is that this policeman sees and has discussions with the dead people he's trying to "help". They're apparently not ghosts or anything supernatural; instead, they're figments of his imagination, and he acknowledges them as such. They never tell him anything he doesn't know already, and they look like his mental image of them at the time. For example, in the latest episode, he investigates a young artist's murder. When he learns that he's part of a drug-dealing street gang, he starts seeing him with a submachine gun in his hands. You get the picture.

Looks I wound up explaining the premise of the show anyway. Huh. Figures I once wanted to be a teacher. No way to escape one's vocation, eh?

The reason I bring this up is because I realized that the process in which Raines visualizes the victims is, in essence, exactly the same way the reader of a novel imagines the book's characters. A reader gets an initial impression of a character, only detailed as much as the writer intends, and this impression may or may not be accurate. However, it becomes refined as the book goes on and further details the character's backstory, actions, mannerisms, preferences, physical appearance and such. It's a gradual process, and to me a very interesting one. Try this at home: next time you read a book, pick a main character and try to imagine what he or she looks like, how he or she moves and speaks, etc. Do this after every chapter in which this character is involved. When you're done, compare your final impression of the character with your first. Is it the same? Did it change over the course of the book and come full circle? Is it different? Were you completely wrong at first? Completely right? Did the author intentionally mislead you for effect, only to reveal the truth later? Was there more to the character than you had first assumed? Less? Did you start or stop liking him or her at a particular point? Why?

Human instinct (some would call it animal instinct, but I'm not taking sides in that debate) tells us that making snap judgements about new elements in our lives is a good way to ensure our continued survival. This doesn't seem to have much to do with writing novels, but it's in fact a crucial part of the process of telling a story. You have to expect your audience to imagine things about your world and your characters that you haven't told them to imagine, and you have to decide when and how to break these impressions, or even if you want to break them at all.

That's probably the kind of stuff they tell you in creative writing classes and such. Man, I'm glad I'm figuring it out by myself. It's much cheaper that way.

Of fat and the loss thereof

Posted on 2007.03.27 at 16:59
One day, about three years ago, I stepped on the scales and saw that I weighed 313 pounds. I'm 6'3 and naturally built large, but that was still a lot heavier than I was comfortable with. Since then I've lost 55 pounds. I thought it was going to be difficult, but to my surprise it really wasn't. In fact, it hardly took any effort at all.

I didn't follow anything you could call a diet, and I didn't undertake any particular exercise routine. I eat just about everything I used to eat before, only a bit less of everything. People see how much thinner I've got and all say they admire my willpower.  The compliment is nice, but it's kind of underserved. Do I have more willpower than the average fatso? I can't tell. How do you measure willpower? I just take smaller portions, and realize "hey, I'm not hungry anymore", and stop. I sometimes stop in front of the pantry in the middle of the afternoon to grab a chocolate cookie, but I take one instead of three. It's not like I'm resisting KGB interrogation. I'm still in control of my limbs; if I don't want a second helping of cake, I just, you know, keep my arms at my sides and tell myself that this is sugar I won't have to sweat off. It feels good. It's just like physical exercise, except that I don't have to actually do it. That's freaking awesome.

Hell, I had been fat for 20 years, and I never even bothered to try getting into shape because I was surrounded by fat people who constantly complained that losing weight was difficult, painful, and sometimes impossible. That sucked. Maybe that's why we have that problem in North America now. People are so convinced that losing weight is a pain in the ass that they can't convince themselves that efforts will have results.

Meh, that's probably just a small part of the problem. I'm beginning to talk out my surprisingly firm buttocks here, so I should probably just stop typing for today.

New beginnings

Posted on 2007.03.24 at 06:25
You know, it's been a day short of a year since I've started this journal. And I've had exactly one post on it before the one you're reading at this moment. It's deleted now, it didn't agree with me anymore. But still. I feel like this means something, even if I'm not sure what that meaning is.
Isn't it the same for a lot of things? We find meaning everywhere (well, some of us anyway), but we can't identify it. Colors but not shapes. Notes but not melodies.
Anyway.
I've been 26 years old for a couple of weeks now. And I've been looking back upon what I have to show for it. My life has been one of study, of research, and of writing. (Much writing, but not much accomplishment. You could count the stories I've finished one the fingers of a man whose arms have been cut off and incinerated. It's that bad.) I don't regret the time I've spent doing this, of course. I could have worked faster, but in a way all this effort spent towards honing the abilities I have chosen to train has not been wasted. But still.
I look back, and feel like there's something missing. I feel like I've been shoveling clouds. And only recently have I begun to realize what I needed.
I want to craft. I want to build. I want to cook. I want to sculpt. (I've been drawing; that's a start.) I want to raise a barn. I watch TV shows like Holmes on Homes and I tell myself "that looks like hard work, but dammit I'd like to be there doing that". I see someone building a bookcase, and I'm all "well if I had learned to do that instead of telling the difference between the philosophies of Sartre and Kierkegaard, I'd be shopping for lumber instead of furniture, and wood is hella cheaper when it's just a bunch of planks".
I know I'm approaching this with a kind of enthusiastic naiveté, but I'll be damned if I can help how I feel.
I've made myself to be an intellectual, but that might have been a mistake. Well, not really a mistake so much as a skewed perspective on life. I am more than I thought I was, and in failing to know my full potential I have failed to fulfill some needs that I refused to acknowledge I had.
I have a crippling sleep disorder; I won't go into details at this point but it's really quite bad. It's been diagnosed as "idiopathic hypersomnia", which is doctorspeak for "you sleep way too much, but even after testing you inside and out we have no clue why".
Well, maybe I'm beginning to see why.
It's time to move.
At last.